[FREE IRAN Project] In The Spirit Of Cyrus The Great Forum Index [FREE IRAN Project] In The Spirit Of Cyrus The Great
Views expressed here are not necessarily the views & opinions of ActivistChat.com. Comments are unmoderated. Abusive remarks may be deleted. ActivistChat.com retains the rights to all content/IP info in in this forum and may re-post content elsewhere.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Why Should We Boycott British Products & Services?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    [FREE IRAN Project] In The Spirit Of Cyrus The Great Forum Index -> Noteworthy Discussion Threads
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
cyrus
Site Admin


Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 4993

PostPosted: Tue May 10, 2005 12:07 pm    Post subject: Why Should We Boycott British Products & Services? Reply with quote

Why Should The Freedom Loving People Of The World Boycott British Products & Services?

Click on Link or Image To See The Flash & Video Clip From Logan The Father of Terror Master: http://www.activistchat.com/mustget/index.html




Among the Iranian the memory of Dr. Mossadegh remains as a symbol of independence, Liberal Democratic values, and high moral and ethical values. Iranian people admire and respect Dr. Mossadegh as Americans love and respect Thomas Jefferson. The Iranian people admiration and respect for Dr. Mossadegh does not mean that he was prefect without any mistakes. Today many Iranians believe Reza Shah The Great, Father of Modern Iran, his son former Shah of Iran the Architect of Modern Iran, Dr. Mossadegh and Prime Minister Dr. Shapur Bakhtiar were all Iranian patriots and they have worked hard for the independence of our homeland and deserve our respect despite the fact that they have made number of mistakes in very difficult circumstances, like many other politicians and leaders throughout human history. We should ask ourselves who has not made any mistakes? Today we should learn from history, forget our artificial differences and concentrate to help our fellow Iranian people to free our homeland from Islamic Clerical Regime and replacing this regime with secular government by free referendum After Regime Change. Today Iranian people are demanding civil and political freedoms, separation of religion and government, equality and justice (especially for the Iranian women), the immediate liberation of all political prisoners and Free Referendum.


Last edited by cyrus on Sat Jun 25, 2005 3:07 pm; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cyrus
Site Admin


Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 4993

PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2005 11:03 am    Post subject: Blair backs referring Iran to U.N. Reply with quote

Quote:
Blair backs referring Iran to U.N.
Thursday, May 12, 2005 Posted: 1221 GMT (2021 HKT)

Source: http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/05/12/blair/index.html

LONDON, England -- British Prime Minister Tony Blair has said he would support Iran being referred to the U.N. Security Council if Tehran breached its nuclear obligations.

"We certainly will support referral to the U.N. Security Council if Iran breaches its undertaking and obligations," Blair said Thursday at his first news conference since his Labour Party won a historic third term in last week's elections.

Blair has faced calls from within his own party to step down sooner rather than later.
Image:



This is too little too late Mr. Blair what we expect from UK are as follows:
1) Fire Jack Straw NOW
2) Make a formal apology from freedom loving Iranian people regarding past 26 years Neo Colonialist policy towards Iran by supporting Mullahs.
3) Make a formal apology from freedom loving Iranian people for acting as lobbyist for Mullahs regime in Washington.
4) Make a formal apology from freedom loving Iranian people regarding past 200 years British Colonialist and Terrorist policy towards Iran (for conspiracy to murder reformist prime ministers ….).
5) Freeze all Mullahs asset in UK and return it to future truly elected Iranian government and put an end to all illegal contracts that are signed by bribing corrupt Mullahs.
6) Support regime change policy by Iranian people and replacing the Mullahs regime with secular democracy.
7) Iranian people must be treated as equal partner and stop British conspiracy policy for stealing Iranian resources.

Mr. Blair You Can Not Hide Your Head in The Sand For Very Long,
You Must Face The Reality NOW
The Freedom Loving People of the World are Far Smarter Than You Think Mr. Blair


Or when you are looking at the mirror to see your face with shame for the past and present evil acts, at least be honest to yourself for once and say that you serve a Neo Colonialist government and by supporting the Mullah's regime in past 26 years , in a way you and your government supported the following Crimes against humanity and partially responsible for Islamist Terrorist activity through out the world:
Over the past 26 years UK directly and indirectly supported the Islamic regime's agents, courts, judges and vigilantes who have all committed acts of: murder, stoning, torture, assault, theft, destruction of property, arson, perjury, falsification of testimonials and material evidence, illegal surveillance, kidnapping, all kind of terrorist activity, rape, blackmail, fraud, obstruction of justice, conspiracy to commit all of the above crimes, cover-ups and every other form of butchery and depredation.

Mr. Blair's Government Supported an Islamist Regime With Long List of Rape, Torture, Mass Killing and Lies This is Recorded in The History

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ViaDrEtebar



Joined: 03 Aug 2004
Posts: 91

PostPosted: Fri May 20, 2005 10:46 am    Post subject: A letter from Iran to Jack Straw Reply with quote

A letter from Iran to Jack Straw

TO: Mr. Jack Straw

The Foreign Minister of U.K.

Dear Mr. Straw


Since May 18th. 2005 your videos and speeches have been widely spread by international media showing that you are too concern and too anxious about what’s going on in Uzbekistan. This is your right and of course on behalf of your country’s policies to show your anxiety about the Uzbek people. However your anxiety raises a question for us (The Iranian people who are living under the barbaric regime of IRI, the Mullahs, and your brothers).
Mr. Straw, it is understandable that any human being could be sadden for the murderer of innocent people, and we suppose (for now) that you are the one alike. However since yesterday that we have seen your concern and anxiety about the Uzbek people, we are thinking that where were you during last 27 years of occupation of our beloved country IRAN? And where are you now with respect to what’s happening in our country?

In Uzbekistan conflict, the Uzbek Government has killed about 169- 600 of its citizens. But during last 27 years, out of which for the last 6 years you have been the Foreign Minister of the UK Government, the IRI regime has killed more than 100.000 Iranians and has been the main initiator of killings of more than a millions of the Iranians by an imposing war over Iraq, and other regional clashes.

Mr. Straw, only within last 6 years of your foreign ministry more than 30.000 Iranians have been sentenced to death, hungered, tortured to death and have been killed silently in their homes, streets or offices. If you are such nice human being that react over an internal conflict like what’s happening in Uzbekistan (that is very kind of you and any other human being) but why you and the total Government of Mr. Blair have been silent with respect to the Iranian innocent people?

Mr. Straw, as a British man, we understand your policy and your behavior. But when we want to judge you with respect to the global matters, we can only consider you as a co-murderer and as a man who has closed his eyes to the IRI mullahs. If you are a true human being, if you are a man who believes to the God, if you are a man who wants to pretend himself as a human being, please open your eyes and look at the Iranians and what’s happening in Iran. You want to pretend that you are a human being, but in our belief YOU ARE NOT. You and the whole UK Governments staffs since 1978, are like the German Nazis that closed their eyes to any kind of humanity and just took care of their own benefits.

Mr. Straw, we know that you may be welcomed by your people in UK, and at your home town, but please believe us that, even you and all of the Britain’s Governments’ staffs could deceive the world, but you are not able to deceive the HISTORY. If you ever like your name and your records in the history, please open your eyes and look at what’s’ happening in Iran? Be sure that, we – the 70 millions Iranian people- never will forgive you for turning the blind eyes to IRI.

Be wise and change your direction from IRI to the true Iranian People.

The responsibility of this letter is not with the sender and it is the responsibility of me, the writer of this mail. I am known as ALI of SMDK, and I hope that one day you think and you open your eyes with respect to a brutal Government that is IRI and you are its main supporter.

Ali

SMDL

19.05.2005

Tehran-Iran
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cyrus
Site Admin


Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 4993

PostPosted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 11:41 am    Post subject: Blair to head for talks with Bush on Iran Reply with quote



Blair to head for talks with Bush on Iran

Mon. 6 Jun 2005

Iran Focus

London, Jun. 06 - British Prime Minister Tony Blair will fly to Washington for talks with United States President George W Bush on Iran, Iraq, and the Middle East peace process.

Downing Street today announced the trip, with the two leaders’ discussion expected to begin tonight and continue on Tuesday.

Blair will be heading out amid splits between the two countries over Britain's agenda for the G8 summit in Scotland next month.


http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=2303
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cyrus
Site Admin


Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 4993

PostPosted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:51 pm    Post subject: Re: Blair to head for talks with Bush on Iran Reply with quote

cyrus wrote:


Blair to head for talks with Bush on Iran

Mon. 6 Jun 2005

Iran Focus

London, Jun. 06 - British Prime Minister Tony Blair will fly to Washington for talks with United States President George W Bush on Iran, Iraq, and the Middle East peace process.

Downing Street today announced the trip, with the two leaders’ discussion expected to begin tonight and continue on Tuesday.

Blair will be heading out amid splits between the two countries over Britain's agenda for the G8 summit in Scotland next month.


http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=2303


Quote:

Blair's campaign for Africa

http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0606/p01s04-woaf.html
Prime Minister Blair will press President Bush for more funds at a meeting tomorrow.

By Abraham McLaughlin | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA – The US was more generous last year than it has ever been toward Africa, giving $3.2 billion in foreign aid, or about $4.50 per sub-Saharan African. That's triple what it gave in 2000 - and is the most given by any nation.
But tomorrow in Washington British Prime Minister Tony Blair will ask President Bush for more - lots more. Mr. Blair wants rich countries to double their total aid to Africa to $25 billion a year.

Blair's plea, and Mr. Bush's resistance to it, highlight key gaps in their approaches. Blair's is fueled by a strong sense of moral obligation for rich nations to help poor ones - and a public more willing to spend government money on far-away problems. Bush aims to help generously on AIDS, but otherwise target aid where it won't be swallowed by corrupt or inept officials. It's one reason Washington gives foreign countries just 16 cents per $100 of gross domestic product, one of the rich world's lowest rates.

"The US puts a greater emphasis on good government as a prerequisite for aid, says Steven Radelet of the Center for Global Development in Washington.

Yet there is common ground, especially on letting The World Bank cancel billions in developing-world debt. How Bush and Blair tackle their differences tomorrow will help determine the success of July's Africa-focused G-8 summit - and whether the continent can start moving past poverty.

Blair's passion for the continent is multilayered. First, there's his notion that "Christian social democracy" demands that the richest nations help the poorest, says Michael Peel, an associate fellow at The Royal Institute of International Affairs in London. Africa is the one continent that has grown poorer over the last 20 years, prompting Blair to highlight African poverty as "the fundamental moral challenge of our time." Such religion-infused rhetoric is unusual in Europe's secular society. And, although it is popular, Blair's critics call it a "missionary and patronizing approach," says Mr. Peel.

There are also Britain and continental Europe's traditionally strong ties to Africa, including a sense that aid is partly a restitution for colonial-era wrongs.

Momentum is growing in Britain and Europe for increasing aid to poor countries. Rocker Bob Geldof has planned a "Live 8" concert on July 2 with musicians like U2. A reprise of his 1985 "Live Aid" effort, this concert is less about fundraising than putting political pressure on G-8 leaders to help Africa.

Britain boosted its aid from about $1 billion in 2000 to about $1.5 billion in 2004. It's also using its chairmanships of the G-8 and European Union to focus attention on Africa and global warming. Last week, the EU's 25 members voted unanimously to nearly double assistance to poor countries over five years.

Bush also has passions about Africa. Even his opponents allow he's been more focused on the continent than most US presidents. From the start of his first term, a coalition of religious-right and African-American groups encouraged Bush to get involved in Sudan. This helped end Africa's longest war in January.

The continent's growing strategic importance is spurring more American interest, too. The US gets about 10 percent of its oil from Africa now. The US is also keeping a closer eye on African countries that could be terrorist havens.

The AIDS crisis has also prompted US action. Bush's AIDS program, now in its third year, is on track to spend $15 billion over five years, with money allocated for blood supplies, orphans, abstinence education, and other programs. It accounts for most of America's recent increase in aid to Africa. Bush's other signature' program, the Millennium Challenge Account, hasn't disbursed much yet, but it will increasingly steer aid to nations that are strengthening democracy and cutting corruption.

Britain and the US diverge on the issue of corruption. The American view is that, given widespread corruption, "dumping a pile of cash on them isn't going to help," says Stephen Morrison with the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.

The British view is that even if some new aid money is stolen or wasted, it's "better than not having more aid, which you know would do no good," says Peel.

Then there's the question of how to fund any aid increase. Blair wants to set up something called the International Finance Facility. It would raise billions by having rich nations sell bonds, which would eventually need to be repaid. In the US, "it's seen as a gimmick" that would rob future aid budgets to fund a bigger current one, says Dr. Radelet.

Both countries also disagree on how to cancel the debts of African governments, which spend roughly $2 billion a year paying interest. Britain wants to sell part of the IMF's gold cache. But doing so would require Congressional approval, and the Bush team may not want to push for it. But both sides do have proposals out, says Dr. Morrison. And if tomorrow, "Bush and Blair said, 'We're going to fix this by July,'" he says, "they could fix it."


Blair's campaign for Africa is a new deceiving game to change the US attention from FREEDOM in Iran to save Terror Masters in Iran. This is the same game that Powell played few years ago. We should not forget that Tony Blair and Jack Straw are the biggest Mullahs lobbyist force in Washington with connection to Democrats like former president Clinton.



Quote:
Condoleezza Rice's Opening Statement

January 18, 2005
The Associated Press
Houston Chronicle
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/nation/2997586

To be sure, in our world there remain outposts of tyranny and America stands with oppressed people on every continent ... in Cuba, and Burma, and North Korea, and Iran, and Belarus, and Zimbabwe. The world should apply what Natan Sharansky calls the ``town square test'': if a person cannot walk into the middle of the town square and express his or her views without fear of arrest, imprisonment, or physical harm, then that person is living in a fear society, not a free society. We cannot rest until every person living in a ``fear society'' has finally won their freedom.



Blair is against the above statement by Dr. Condoleezza Rice
in my next post I will show the real face of EU 3 in Africa


Quote:

Old Europe (Britain, France and Germany ) Africa Strategy, Historical Facts

In the year 1884, a bunch of Rich Old White Europeans representing all the great conqueror nations of Europe get together in Berlin at Chancellor Bismarck's request.
There, they hatch a plan, mapping out the best possible way to complete the task of colonizing Africa ( http://campus.northpark.edu/history/WebChron/Africa/BerlinConf.CP.html
), subjugating its peoples and stealing its vast store of natural riches.
Their plan succeeds.
The result? Barely four generations later, huge chunks of Africa are smoldering, blasted dead-zones where warlords play musical chairs on each other's corpses, and the security guards (mercenaries) who patrol Western-owned diamond mines, gold mines and oil fields basically lord it over much of the continent.
Soon, even those hired thugs won't be needed, as the laboratory-spawned AIDS virus does for Africa's native population what smallpox-infected blankets did for the indiginous peoples on the American cointinent.

Otto von Bismarck was the principal architect of the Berlin Conference.
This is the same Old Europe that killed 6 million Jews in WWII


Last edited by cyrus on Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:22 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Liberty Now !



Joined: 04 Apr 2004
Posts: 521

PostPosted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 6:35 pm    Post subject: BOO! Reply with quote

Talk about Scary Faces!


if there is a personification of Devil, this must be it.

amazing how the deeds find their way in human face. or in British colonialist -fascsit basterds we may say: devil face.

can anyone tell me what's the roots of British monarchy? and why are they so butt ugly that even one look at them is enough to make one puke?

again, it must be the same evil-fascistic-sadistic-colonialist behaviour which influences the genes and is expressed in the face.

but honestly, what makes them so ugly? what's behind that devil look and expression that is so disgusting to look at?

anyone knows their roots? pirots or thieves or barbarian tribes eating off human flesh? lol
_________________
Paayande Iran
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cyrus
Site Admin


Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 4993

PostPosted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 8:08 pm    Post subject: Re: BOO! Reply with quote

Liberty Now ! wrote:
Talk about Scary Faces!


if there is a personification of Devil, this must be it.

amazing how the deeds find their way in human face. or in British colonialist -fascsit basterds we may say: devil face.

can anyone tell me what's the roots of British monarchy? and why are they so butt ugly that even one look at them is enough to make one puke?

again, it must be the same evil-fascistic-sadistic-colonialist behaviour which influences the genes and is expressed in the face.

but honestly, what makes them so ugly? what's behind that devil look and expression that is so disgusting to look at?

anyone knows their roots? pirots or thieves or barbarian tribes eating off human flesh? lol




Quote:
Timeline: Anthrax through the ages
October 16, 2001 Posted: 9:01 PM EDT (0101 GMT)


http://edition.cnn.com/2001/HEALTH/conditions/10/16/anthrax.timeline/

(CNN) -- Although it's surfacing anew as a terrorist weapon, the deadly anthrax disease has plagued the world for centuries, with reports of it dating back to biblical times.

Anthrax is blamed for several devastating plagues that killed both humans and livestock. Soon after scientists learned more about it in the late 1800s, it emerged in World War I as a biological weapon.

Several countries, including Germany, Japan, the United States, the United Kingdom, Iraq and the former Soviet Union, are believed to have experimented with anthrax, but its use in warfare has been limited.

1500 B.C. -- Fifth Egyptian plague, affecting livestock, and the sixth, known as the plague of boils, symptomatic of anthrax

1600s -- "Black Bane," thought to be anthrax, kills 60,000 cattle in Europe

1876 -- Robert Koch confirms bacterial origin of anthrax

EXTRA INFORMATION
In Depth: The anthrax investigation


1880 -- First successful immunization of livestock against anthrax .

1915 -- German agents in the United States believed to have injected horses, mules, and cattle with anthrax on their way to Europe during World War I

1937 -- Japan starts biological warfare program in Manchuria, including tests involving anthrax

1942 -- United Kingdom experiments with anthrax at Gruinard Island off the coast of Scotland. It was only recently decontaminated.

1943 -- United States begins developing anthrax weapons

1945 -- Anthrax outbreak in Iran kills 1 million sheep

1950s and '60s -- U.S. biological warfare program continues after World War II at Fort Detrick, Maryland

1969 -- President Richard Nixon ends United States' offensive biological weapons program. Defensive work continues

1970 -- Anthrax vaccine approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration

1972 -- International convention outlaws development or stockpiling of biological weapons

1978-80 -- Human anthrax epidemic strikes Zimbabwe, infecting more than 6,000 and killing as many as 100

1979 -- Aerosolized anthrax spores released accidentally at a Soviet Union military facility, killing about 68 people

1991 -- U.S. troops vaccinated for anthrax in preparation for Gulf War

1990-93 -- The terrorist group, Aum Shinrikyo, releases anthrax in Tokyo but no one is injured

1995 -- Iraq admits it produced 8,500 liters of concentrated anthrax as part of biological weapons program

1998 -- U.S. Secretary of Defense William Cohen approves anthrax vaccination plan for all military service members

2001 -- A letter containing anthrax spores is mailed to NBC one week after the September 11 terrorist attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center. It was the first of a number of incidents around the country. In Florida, a man dies after inhaling anthrax at the offices of American Media Inc.


Quote:
1942 -- United Kingdom experiments with anthrax at Gruinard Island off the coast of Scotland. It was only recently decontaminated.
1945 -- Anthrax outbreak in Iran kills 1 million sheep


Dear Liberty Now,
Talk about Scary Faces! British Neo Colonialists have a history of Evil acts.

At the end of WWII British forces occupied South of Iran and according to many eye witnesses the British forces using Masks experimenting with Anthrax in Sandaj suburbs and Kermanshah suburbs . According the Kurdish local people the British forces bought lots of potatoes and sheep to carry their experiments.
There was no need to test in such a big scale after second world war unless the British forces was as Evil as Germans in killing 6 million Jews. Today we don’t know how many Kurdish people killed because of this Evil experiment by British Forces.
Khomeni and Mullahs who are British Agents are new Anthrax to destroy Iran youth population for cheap oil and other resources. You should not be surprised that drug is cheaper than cigarette in Tehran, the British Islamist Security forces are in charge of drug distribution in Iran to destory Iranian Youth.


Last edited by cyrus on Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:20 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cyrus
Site Admin


Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 4993

PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:14 am    Post subject: Blair Seeks Bush Support on 2 Initiatives Reply with quote

Quote:

Blair Seeks Bush Support on 2 Initiatives

Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/07/AR2005060700324.html

By BETH GARDINER
The Associated Press
Tuesday, June 7, 2005; 10:21 AM

WASHINGTON -- A U.S. commitment to providing $674 million for famine relief in Africa may take some of the sting out of President Bush's opposition to a proposal by British Prime Minister Tony Blair to spend even more money.

However, the other issue topping Blair foreign policy this year _ fighting global warming _ may further strain his relationship with Bush. Blair has made the issues the twin focus of Britain's yearlong chairmanship of the G-8 group of wealthy nations, yet Bush has rejected many of his close ally's ideas on Africa and the environment.

British Prime Minister Tony Blair arrives at Andrews Air Force Base outside Washington on Tuesday, June 7, 2005. Blair is meeting with President Bush at the White House on Tuesday afternoon. (AP Photo/Kevin Wolf) (Kevin Wolf - AP)

Bush is welcoming Blair to Washington on Tuesday, their first meeting since Blair won a third term in office and his Labour Party suffered heavy losses in Parliament, largely because of voters' unhappiness about his support for the Iraq war.

The joint initiative for famine relief that they were announcing at the White House comes after Blair proposed doubling aid to Africa. The amount of Britain's contribution to the new program was not disclosed, but it was said to be less than that of the United States.

Blair is likely to be disappointed by the U.S. commitment. He has been pushing a broad, long-term _ and far more costly _ effort to help Africa's economy get on its feet, not just emergency food aid. He also wants G-8 countries to commit new money for Africa rather than reallocating funds already earmarked for foreign assistance.

White House spokesman Scott McClellan said the $674 million commitment should be considered separate from any G-8 action. He said the United States is still discussing debt relief for African nations with other members of the G-8, although he would not discuss what additional aid the U.S. might be willing to commit to before Bush's meeting with Blair.

The money the U.S. has already committed will be drawn from funds already approved for an Agriculture Department food aid account and other funds available in a recent supplemental appropriation.

Besides focusing on the food needs of 14 million people vulnerable to famine in Ethiopia and Eritrea, the joint initiative will address humanitarian needs in Somalia and Djibouti, McClellan said.

"The two leaders will also be calling on other countries to increase their funding to meet this emergency," McClellan said. "This is something that is needed now, in the coming months."

Blair, the host of this year's summit of the major eight industrialized democracies, hopes to use the meeting in early July in Gleneagles, Scotland, to raise an extra $50 billion a year by selling bonds on the world's capital markets.

"It doesn't fit our budgetary process," Bush said last week. The Bush administration says the mechanism would conflict with U.S. budget laws by binding future governments to providing money.

Blair acknowledged in an interview published Tuesday that he will not win U.S. support for his plans to double aid to Africa or the Kyoto Protocol on global warming, but insisted progress could still be made on Britain's G-8 priorities.

Speaking to the Financial Times newspaper before leaving Monday, Blair said there were "certain things we know they are not going to do." Asked if he thought he could persuade Bush to shift some ground, Blair responded: "Wait and see. There's all sorts of ways people can get into this argument. We are at the beginning of the process."

Bush and Blair, in a joint news conference Tuesday afternoon, were calling on other countries to increase their commitment to address humanitarian emergencies in Africa, the White House official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because the announcement has not been formally made. Besides the $674 million, the United States has earmarked $1.4 billion requested by the United Nations to address emergency needs.

The prime minister's visit is part of a blitz of trips he's taking to lobby foreign leaders on Africa and global warming ahead of the G-8 summit. He recently saw Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi in Rome, and in the coming weeks he will visit Russian President Vladimir Putin, French President Jacques Chirac and German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder.

American support is crucial to Blair, but he may face an uphill fight to win it on global warming. The president opposes the Kyoto Protocol, and his administration questions scientists' views that man-made pollutants are causing temperatures to rise.

On Monday, Blair's official spokesman said the prime minister wasn't looking for a major breakthrough in Washington. Britain and the United States agree that Africa is a priority, the spokesman added.

___



SAY NO To Crying Wolf Neo Colonialist BLAIR

Blair's campaign for Africa is a new deceiving game to change the US attention from FREEDOM in Iran and other parts of the world to save Terror Masters in Iran. This is the same game that Powell played few years ago. We should not forget that Tony Blair and Jack Straw are the biggest Mullahs lobbyist force in Washington with connection to Democrats like former president Clinton.
Due to the fact that US is not responsible for Africa destruction the US Tax Payers should not pay a dime for Africa and must force the EU countries to pay 100 billion dollars each year under US supervision for how the money should be spent as damages to Africa by EU countries for the past 400 years destruction policy.
However US should should focus all the Aid package to establishing Freedom and democracy in all developing countries.

Quote:
Condoleezza Rice's Opening Statement

January 18, 2005
The Associated Press
Houston Chronicle
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/nation/2997586

To be sure, in our world there remain outposts of tyranny and America stands with oppressed people on every continent ... in Cuba, and Burma, and North Korea, and Iran, and Belarus, and Zimbabwe. The world should apply what Natan Sharansky calls the ``town square test'': if a person cannot walk into the middle of the town square and express his or her views without fear of arrest, imprisonment, or physical harm, then that person is living in a fear society, not a free society. We cannot rest until every person living in a ``fear society'' has finally won their freedom.



Blair is against the above statement by Dr. Condoleezza Rice
in my next post I will show the real face of EU 3 in Africa


Quote:

Old Europe (Britain, France and Germany ) Africa Strategy, Historical Facts

In the year 1884, a bunch of Rich Old White Europeans representing all the great conqueror nations of Europe get together in Berlin at Chancellor Bismarck's request.
There, they hatch a plan, mapping out the best possible way to complete the task of colonizing Africa ( http://campus.northpark.edu/history/WebChron/Africa/BerlinConf.CP.html
), subjugating its peoples and stealing its vast store of natural riches.
Their plan succeeds.
The result? Barely four generations later, huge chunks of Africa are smoldering, blasted dead-zones where warlords play musical chairs on each other's corpses, and the security guards (mercenaries) who patrol Western-owned diamond mines, gold mines and oil fields basically lord it over much of the continent.
Soon, even those hired thugs won't be needed, as the laboratory-spawned AIDS virus does for Africa's native population what smallpox-infected blankets did for the indiginous peoples on the American cointinent.

Otto von Bismarck was the principal architect of the Berlin Conference.
This is the same Old Europe that killed 6 million Jews in WWII
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cyrus
Site Admin


Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 4993

PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:47 am    Post subject: Neo Colonialist EU 3 Leader Blair Failed Reply with quote

President Bush to Corrupt EU 3 Neo Colonialist Leader Tony Blair The Mullah Terror Master Supporter:
"We've got a lot of big talkers", We Do What We Say
"Nobody wants to give money to a country that's corrupt, where leaders take money and put it in their pocket," President Bush told reporters as Blair stood soberly beside him.


What is the Truth?
To clarify President Bush point further regarding his correct statement "Nobody wants to give money to a country that's corrupt, where leaders take money and put it in their pocket,"
I should say these corrupt leaders of developing countries are putting the stolen money in British, Swiss, Canadian Banks like British Barclays bank, Midland …. Banks and EU3 Bankers are benefiting from these stolen money , plus the fact that most of these corrupt leaders either get killed before they can really use the stolen money (Sadam’s Sons) or ….
This is well known fact that during WWII the Nazi officials wealth which was taken from 6 million Jews killed by Nazi deposited the stolen money in Swiss Banks and most of these corrupt Nazi killed and in reality the Swiss Bankers benefited from stolen money.
Now in the case of Iran in past 26 years and even today the Billionaires Mullahs who have stolen Iranian people’s money and they have deposited most of these stolen money in Britain, Canada, France and other EU countries and they even bought Highway in Canada and very expensive real estate in Canada , Europe and also invested in Stock markets under many different names. The Mullahs even sold the Iran’s Vaghf Lands (Donated Lands for Charity by rich Iranian in Past 1000 years) which according to the Law they could not sell these lands. The Mullahs and their families deposited these stolen money from Iran in European countries and even bought very expensive real estate in London…… Independent Honest Journalists can check all these facts for themselves.
No wonder 95% of Iranian people have become so poor .
Conclusion:
The Corrupt Mafia Mullahs and Their Family Members = The Corrupt EU 3 Leaders who support the Terror Masters and Torture Masters


The freedom loving hard working American Tax Payers must say no to EU3 and Blair game and support president Bush on this issue.


Quote:


Bush and Blair close on debt-relief deal

By Farah Stockman The Boston Globe

THURSDAY, JUNE 9, 2005

Source: http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/06/08/news/bush.php

WASHINGTON

But after their meeting Tuesday, the two leaders appeared as divided as ever on increasing aid to Africa and on reviving international action on global warming, two issues on which Blair has staked his reputation as the host of the Group of 8 summit meeting in Scotland next month.

At a White House news conference, Blair was unsmiling and appeared subdued as Bush devoted much of his time talking about what the United States is already doing to help Africa, rather than addressing Blair's ambitious proposal to double the $25 billion in international aid to the troubled continent.

Bush also criticized "big talkers" who speak of doing more for Africa but who have not given as much as the United States, which has increased aid to Africa since 2000 and now gives roughly twice as much as any other donor.


"We've got a lot of big talkers," Bush said. "What I like to say is my administration actually does what we say we're going to do, and we have."

But it underscored deep differences that are likely to remain throughout Bush's second term.

"Nobody wants to give money to a country that's corrupt, where leaders take money and put it in their pocket," Bush told reporters as Blair stood soberly beside him.

The Bush administration has already increased aid to Africa in the past four years, to $3.2 billion from $1.6 billion, according to U.S. State Department figures, with most of the rise going in food aid to Sudan and Ethiopia, as well as funding of programs to combat AIDS.

U.S. aid is expected to continue to rise by several billion dollars, once promised financing for anti-AIDS programs ramps up and the Millennium Challenge Corporation begins giving more aid to African countries that have displayed good governance.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Liberty Now !



Joined: 04 Apr 2004
Posts: 521

PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:13 pm    Post subject: Re: BOO! Reply with quote

[quote="cyrus"]

Quote:
Timeline: Anthrax through the ages
October 16, 2001 Posted: 9:01 PM EDT (0101 GMT)


http://edition.cnn.com/2001/HEALTH/conditions/10/16/anthrax.timeline/


Cyrus jan, are you saying the British Monarchs's disgusting face is a result of Anthrax? lol

so it's not the result of decades of COLONIALIST - FASCISM and CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY?

I believe it's their Historic Crimes and twisted mentality that influences their physical body: warning Humanity: WATCH IT! THIS IS A DANGEROUS FACE OF COLONIALO-FASCISM: STAY AS FAR AWAY AS POSSIBLE! OR ELIMINATE IT FOR HUMANITY'S BENEFIT!

lol
_________________
Paayande Iran
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cyrus
Site Admin


Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 4993

PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2007 7:13 pm    Post subject: British Colonialist Barbarians Burned Library Of Congress, W Reply with quote

British Colonialist Barbarians Burned Library Of Congress, Washington City. White House On August 24, 1814




The Burning of the City of Washington (Memory): American Treasures of the Library of Congress
Source:
http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/treasures/trm001.html

At about 8 p.m. on the evening of August 24, 1814, British troops under the command of General Robert Ross marched into Washington, D.C., after routing hastily assembled American forces at Bladensburg, Maryland, earlier in the day. Encountering neither resistance nor any United States government officials--President Madison and his cabinet had fled to safety--the British quickly torched the White House, the Capitol, which then housed the Library of Congress, the navy yard, and several American warships. However, most private property was left untouched. In 1815 Congress approved the purchase of Thomas Jefferson's library to replace the one lost in the fire.



Source: http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/today/aug19.html
Capture and Burning of Washington by the British, in 1814 (detail),
wood engraving, 1876.
Prints and Photographs Division

On August 19, 1814, during the War of 1812, British troops under the command of Major General Robert Ross and Rear Admiral George Cockburn landed at Benedict, Maryland on the shores of the Patuxent River. The British fleet, under the command of Vice Admiral Sir Alexander Cochrane, had chased U.S. Commodore Joshua Barney's flotilla into the Patuxent River, but their true goal was the capture of the nation's capital, Washington, D.C. — only a few days march away. At the same time, Vice Admiral Cochrane ordered Captain James Gordon to sail other British warships up the Potomac River towards Washington which was defended only by Fort Warburton (later renamed Fort Washington) on the east bank of the river, twelve miles south of the nation's capital. News of this British onslaught caused panic in Washington and many of its residents fled.

[url][/url]
The Taking of the City of Washington (detail),
G. Thompson, publisher, 1814.
By Popular Demand: Portraits of the Presidents and First Ladies

Commodore Joshua Barney commanded an assortment of small, quick gunboats, galleys, and barges that for weeks prior had outmaneuvered the larger British ships in the shallow Chesapeake waters. However, after being forced up the Patuxent, Barney and his men abandoned and destroyed their flotilla, linked up with a contingent of marines, and marched to Washington. Unsure of where the British would attack, American volunteers and militiamen from Maryland, Virginia, and Washington also scrambled to the capital and its outskirts. When word reached them that the British were marching towards Bladensburg, the American forces moved there to take up defensive positions.

Although the Americans outnumbered the British at Bladensburg, they were no match for the well-disciplined professional soldiers under the command of Major General Ross. On August 24, after thousands of American militiamen had retreated, only a small contingent of flotilla men and marines under Barney's command managed a valiant but futile counterattack. The British troops then continued on to Washington.


Mrs. James Madison, (Dolley Payne),
Gilbert Stuart, artist,
between 1804 and 1855.
By Popular Demand: Portraits of the Presidents and First Ladies

Before leaving the city, First Lady Dolley Madison ordered White House possessions be packed and removed from the city — silverware, books, clocks, curtains, and most importantly, Gilbert Stuart's full-length portrait of George Washington. President James Madison escaped only hours before the British entered the city. In order to prevent the British from capturing it, the Americans set fire to the Washington Navy Yard. Upon entering the city, the British set fire to the White House, the Capitol, and many of the other public buildings. The Patent Office, however, was saved from destruction by the superintendent of patents, Dr. William Thornton, who convinced the British of the importance of its preservation.

The Battle of Bladensburg and the burning of Washington were humiliating defeats for the United States. Within a few days, however, citizens were able to return to the decimated city. The British left Washington as swiftly as they had entered, moving on to capture the City of Alexandria and lay siege to Baltimore.

Search on Battle of Bladensburg in the collection A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation to read petitions regarding compensation for wounds and damages received at the Battle of Bladensburg. Also, search on burning of Washington or Fort Warburton for similar petitions.
Learn more about the City of Bladensburg. Search on Bladensburg in Built in America: Historic Building and Engineering, 1933-Present. Although some of the photographs have not yet been digitized, the data pages concerning the buildings in Bladensburg provide background information about the city and the people who lived there. Also search this collection for buildings that were burned in Washington, D.C., such as the White House, and buildings that were saved, such as the Patent Office.
To learn more about the War of 1812, see Today in History features on the declaration of war against Great Britain and the assault on Baltimore which inspired Francis Scott Key to write the "Star-Spangled Banner."
Children's Television

Father Reading Newspaper, Two Children Viewing Television,
New York, New York,
Gottscho-Schleisner, Inc., photographer, July 15, 1950.
Architecture and Interior Design for 20th Century America, 1935-1955

The American Broadcasting Company first aired Saturday morning television shows for children on August 19, 1950. The network introduced two shows: Animal Clinic featured live animals, while the variety show Acrobat Ranch had a circus theme. Placed against a Western backdrop, acrobats Tumbling Tim and Flying Flo lent an air of spectacle to Acrobat Ranch. In one segment, Host Uncle Jim presided over a game in which children from the studio audience competed for merchandise prizes.

The first children's entertainer to perform for television was Burr Tillstrom, who broadcast live from the New York World's Fair in 1939. The National Broadcasting Company began the first regular television broadcasts in the United States the same year. Initially, the network offered just two hours of programming per week.

Quote:

Symbol Of British Colonialists Barbarian Who Burned Library Of
Congress, City Of Washington, White House On August 24, 1814 Welcomed To White House On May 7, 2007

Approximately 7,000 guests attended the Arrival Ceremony, including the American and British delegations, British Embassy staff, State Dinner guests, Members of Congress, Cabinet Members, White House staff and their guests, State Department staff, and students.



Quote:
Video Clip Of Cleopatra - The Burning of the Library of Alexandria
Elizabeth Taylor gives voice to the rage still felt over the loss of the Great Library because of Roman/Republican bungling. More ravishingly beautiful ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bY4-PzHgA0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cyrus
Site Admin


Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 4993

PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2007 4:33 pm    Post subject: Tony Blair is leaving behind him a religious time bomb, says Reply with quote

Quote:
Tony Blair is leaving behind him a religious time bomb, says NSS
http://www.secularism.org.uk/81350.html

Commenting on the departure of Mr Blair – widely regarded as one of the most religious Prime Minister’s since Gladstone – Keith Porteous Wood of the National Secular Society said: “Tony Blair has done more to undermine the secular nature of our society than anyone in recent history. In an effort to placate angry and violent Muslim youths, Mr Blair has opened a Pandora’s Box of religious power-seeking. His encouragement of single faith schools is adding momentum to the already rapid fragmentation of British society. Racial and religious ghettoes are now almost self-contained and operating on a dangerous parallel with the rest of society. By insisting on addressing minority communities through their religious leaders, he has given sometimes extreme clergy an importance quite out of proportion to their real value.”

Mr Wood said that the Government’s policy of consulting religious communities about policy-making had emboldened religious leaders who are now regularly attempting to use their new-found power to thwart socially progressive legislation.

“These people are completely out of step with the wishes of the British people. Hardly anybody in this country knows who their bishop is, and yet the Government still clings to the idea that clerics are somehow ‘representative’.

“Those Muslims who do not wish to be defined primarily or at all by their religion are voiceless. The Government prefers to listen to the noisy theocrats, the mullahs and the imams, who claim to speak for all Muslims. Consequently, the moderate and the integrationist voices from the Muslim community are never heard. All we hear is from the people who want sharia law and more veiling.”

Mr Wood said that all the statistics show that Britain is probably one of the least religious nations in the world, and yet Mr Blair had placed religion at the top of the national agenda. In doing so, he has set a time bomb of conflict that will explode in future generations.

Mr Wood acknowledged that the Blair administration had overseen a “wonderful programme of equality legislation – much of it long overdue” - – even though much of it was required by EU directives.


Blair wrote:

http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/05-17-2007/0004591022&EDATE=
And we took a decision that we thought was very difficult. I thought
then, and I think now, it was the right decision. History will make a
judgment at a particular time. But one thing I know is that what we
represent coming here today, speaking in the Rose Garden to you people and getting your questions and being under your pressure, that is a finer and better way of life than either a brutal, secular dictatorship or religious
extremism.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cyrus
Site Admin


Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 4993

PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:39 am    Post subject: British Historical Record Reply with quote

Javidiran <javidiran@payandehiran.org>Post wrote:
Dear Mr./Ms. Tommy Denton ;


I was reading your posting at the Royal Dutch Shell plc .com


Although your are on the right track for some part of your writing but you have many twisted words that I would like for you to be kind reading my words as follows.



One Cannot forget that it was the tricky Brits and French who destroyed the Ottoman Empire and it was the British and French leaders who in 1923, redrew the map of that region.



It was the Brits who created the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt, (Ekhwan-ol moslemin), in 1928. The Brits then helped the creation of the Fadaaiyaan-e Eslaam, in the Iranian soil a version who assassinated people like of Ali Razmara, Ahmad Kasravi, Hassan-Ali-Mansoor, close brothers of assassins at the MBH in 1946.



In Egypt Hassan Al- Banna and in Iranian soil Navvaab Safavi were the leaders of those organizations. Both like Ayatollah Khomeini were known British agents in their respective countries. The result of their work benefited British wishes for the region, as well as today Moghtada-Al- Sadr’s efforts benefits Britons and Russians.



Than again it was the British who with the aid of the BBC, planed and plotted the overthrew of the progressive and peace loving government of the late Shah of Iran in 1979.

Britain has been the main supporter of the terrorist regime of the Mullahs ever since.



Than it was the terrorist Mullahs of Iran who in the early 80's created, funded armed and supported the terrorist networks such as Hamas and Hezbollah. There is no doubt that the Brits were fully aware of the Mullahs involvement in Lebanon and Palestine but they did nothing to stop them.

I am sure that the Brits knew but turned a blind eye on this and other crimes of the Mullahs regime.



Today it is a hard but disturbing fact that for many years, the top experts from the British foreign Office and White Hall meet every wednesday in Tehran with the the thugs of the Islamic Republic in Iran's foreign Office, giving them step by step guidance and advice.



The Brits brought nothing but death, destruction, division, poverty and disaster where ever they set foot. Instead they took away nations wealth, unity and pride from them.

The Middle Eastern and the African countries are suffering for over 250 years thank to Britain 's continued direct and indirect aggression and interference.



Look at India or Pakistan today, once Britain 's milking cows.

Look at Africa and the Middle East today.

Look at Iran 29 years after the mad Khomeini, the British Bulldozer was returned to Iran .



In one word, Americans only inherited the troubles in four corners of the world which was created by the filthy Brits in the first place.



Hassan Al- Banna, The British agent.

Founder of Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt . 1928.

A dangerous ideology which is threatening the world.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++





Navvaab Safavi, The British agent.

Founder of the terrorist movement of

Fadaayiaan-e Eslaam in Iran. 1946.

He was responsible for many political assassinations in Iran .


Ruhollah Hindi Khomeini, The British agent.

Wrath of God & British Bulldozer.

Merciless, cold hearted, ruthless bloodsucker.

Destroyer of progressive & modern Iran . 1979.

Khomeini and his thugs murdered executed, tortured,

imprisoned displaced millions of Iranians.

For the rest of my comment please read between lines here below:

The Roanoke Times: That old, familiar feeling in Iran


Quote:

Posted by Royal Dutch Shell Plc.com at June 4th, 2007

By Tommy Denton

Once upon a time, the British crown so frowned upon certain aspirations among its colonists in America that the Redcoats waged an unsuccessful war to quell the usurpations.

For the Americans, what began as a tea party finished in the birth of a new nation, the sovereign people determined to be masters of their own destiny.

About 125 years later, in 1901, the British crown agreed to help relieve the indebtedness of Mozzafar al-Din Shah Qajar, then shah of Iran, by “accepting” a 60-year concession to develop Iranian oil fields. Englishman William Knox D’Arcy struck the first commercially important reserve in 1908, later transferring controlling interest to what became the Anglo-Persian Oil Co. in 1909.

[[Don’t forget mentioning the agreement of 1919, negotiated and signed by and English man named Armitage Smith… the most stealing agreement that approved by “Mossadegh-ol-saltaneh” the notorious British agent ever he was 12 years of age during Kajar, as his uncle Farmanfarma learned to be. HC]]

After World War I, the British crown saw the wisdom, practicality and efficiency of simply nationalizing the oil, later securing it by stationing British troops in strategic parts of Iran .

As restless natives historically have been wont to do, the Iranians became restive with the plundering of what they considered to be their own oil, with a modest 16 percent of the profits set aside for the home folks. Nor were the Iranians at all pleased with British interference in their Persian Constitutional Revolution, much less British use of Iran as a platform to invade Russia in a vain attempt to reverse the Bolsheviks’ October revolution.

In 1921, the British crown saw the usefulness of engineering a coup in Iran that installed Reza Pahlavi as the shah. A great era of modernization and development began, especially the Persian Corridor with its railroads for both military and civilian routes, but then Reza began to show a troublesome independent streak.

[[Britons never ever planned working with Reza Shah the Great, with respect to the engineering a Coup. The army general Ironside called him to the capital so he can bring order into the army on behalf of leaving British army, they have planned working with Seyyed Zia-Asadabadi, who his cabinet forced out in 90 day. But Because Reza Khan was smart and was looking to gain power so he can modernize and develop the country, he engineered his own Coup D’eta, without British Foreign Affairs knowledge. Ever since Britons were working to take him out. Reza Shah Never liked Britons never wished working with them, he even through the Knox D’Arcy’s agreement in fire, which Britons did not like it… Britons through their well established man “Mossadegh-ol-saltaneh” always blocked Reza Shah from building Rail Rod, when they found that they cannot confront Reza Shah changing his ambition Mossadegh was instructed to force Reza Shah building Rail Road from then Iraq-to-Pakistan (both being British colony then) C]]

Reza redrafted the Anglo-Persian Oil Co. concession in the mid-1930s, reducing the land available for the venture’s exploration and increasing his government’s share of the profits. By 1941, the British invaded and generally took over — railroads, oil production and effectively the government as well, installing Reza’s compliant 22-year-old son, Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, as shah.

[[Again, Britons did not wish for Mohammad Reza Shah replacing Reza Shah, if it was not for t he political game playing by Mr. Foroughi, Britons were forcing to have Republic instead of Monarchy.. Hc]]

In postwar Iran , the crippled British government relied significantly on oil revenues from its empire. But the increasingly nationalist impulses of the Iranian government led to increased assertiveness, including demands for accountability in payment of royalties.

By 1951, tensions grew. Prime Minister Ali Razmara was assassinated in March. By April, the parliament passed a bill to nationalize the oil industry. Led by Western-educated Mohammed Mossadegh, the lawmakers indicated during debates that such independence was necessary to break free from the grip of British intelligence services. Mossadegh was elected prime minister in May.

[[According to the 1906 Constitution, there is no such article electing a prime minister, as per 1906 Constitution, Shah appointed the Prime Minister and Majless had to approve the credential of the Appointed PM. Mossadegh even did not have his Diploma when he went Switzerland, he has translated some Islamic rules copied from the religious book, by a translator injecting as his Doctorate Papers, he never completed his study. Mossadegh’s Nationalization of OIL was to monopolize British concession over Iran ’s land discovering and developing OIL, the nationalization blocked American and Russian Counterparts from getting competitive bids from Iran . Therefore the Nationalization benefited Britons, especially when Mossadegh released over 46 related Oil companies that Iran was 16% partner in return of NOTHING from Britons, one of those Companies is today’s BP… Billions of Billions assets, imagine if nationalization did not go through Iran would have been partner of this mammoth asset with BP. HC]]

Alas, Iranians were more easily inspired than they were gifted with sufficient competence to maintain production and export levels, although the British naval blockade was no minor hindrance. Still, the Iranians prevailed in the International Court of Justice in the Hague , where Great Britain sought a ruling that the nationalization was illegal. The crown lost.

Hemmed in, the Iranians began easing into the Cold War orbit of the Soviet Union , its next-door neighbor. Still, President Harry Truman refused British overtures to subvert the parliamentary, sovereign Iranian government.

The election of Dwight Eisenhower in 1952 was more agreeable to British interests. The joint U.S.-British plot code named Operation Ajax, aided by Central Intelligence Agency intervention, would overthrow Soviet-backed Mossadegh in August of 1953 and replace him with the presumed anti-Soviet Gen. Fazlollah Zahedi and restoration of the influence of Shah Reza Pahlavi.

[[This is all dream fiction of Kermit Roosevelt, and that is the way British government what to look, so they can blame interference and manipulation of USA in other nations. But in reality according to many documents, as well as Roy Henderson’s (on time US ambassador to Tehran), Kermit Roosevelt called off and his men left the country to Iraq and he passed the border when Iranian people three days after his failure of doing any good for his master apprised with help of government troop took Mossadegh out. People and army personnel in fear of falling in the hands of Soviet Union , followed with “Mass” Massacre they have came to the street taking Mossadegh out. This cannot be called Coup or something like that because no government, no constitution, no rules and regulation, no army, no civil laws has changed, except the people ousted unwanted, betrayal Prime Minister, yes it was a plot by Britons but did not work. HC]]

In return for its support, however, the United States demanded an end to any British-Iranian oil monopoly and opening of exploration and development as well to five major U.S. oil companies, plus Royal Dutch Shell and a French firm.

[[This has never been possible, because of Nationalization that 100% benefited the holder of concessions that was Britons and Britons only… HC]]

The strategic bonanza of opening an outpost on the Soviet border during the Cold War may have been huge, but the deal-maker that allowed it to happen was the U.S. demand for access to Iranian oil.

All those considerations, especially the CIA role in the coup that removed Mossadegh, help explain the anti-America passions of the revolutionaries who in 1979 seized power, expelled the shah and decided to assert Iranian sovereignty over Iran.

[[Not True, People of Iran never developed any form of HATE toward Americans, they were only nation under restrict surveillance of Martial Law, following 9/11 held candle lite in support of families and sunken individuals at the ground zero. The Hate by the “Mullah” Governement should not be written on the name of People of Iran . The Anti-American Passions following “Mass Mess of 1979” comes from British installed PUPETS = Ayatollahs. Yet people und 29 years of Martial Law of these tyrants listen to the American music, they love Elvis, Michael Jackson, Janet Jackson, they love watching American movies, Hc]]

Alas, recent news reports of presidentially approved CIA covert actions to topple the government in Tehran have a sort of 1953-ish ring of dejA vu all over again.

When will we ever learn?

[[That is very good question; when people who are apologist of British, Russian and EU would learn to be REAL Person… need more truth please do not hesitate call on me, may others writing to you too… don’t be surprised…. 8,000++ reads this ..HC]]

Denton ’s column appears in the Sunday edition of The Roanoke Times
Published: Jun 03, 2007
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    [FREE IRAN Project] In The Spirit Of Cyrus The Great Forum Index -> Noteworthy Discussion Threads All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group